VIJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, UNNAO AND 3 OTHERS
A227/6196/2025 · 2025-10-16
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203748 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203748 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6196 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents no.1, 2 and 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has alleged that proceedings are pending before the respondent no.3. It is further alleged in the petition that the matter was heard finally on 10.09.2025 and the matter has been reserved for orders. A copy of the order dated 10.09.2025 has been brought on record as annexure no.7 and it is urged that since then no orders have been passed.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has pointed out on the basis of the written instructions under the signatures of the Tehsildar Hasanganj that the matter was heard and it was reserved but at the behest of the private parties before the Tehsildar an application was moved for permitting the parties to advance their submissions and opportunities have been given up till 17.10.2025 for the respondents that in case if they may so choose they may file their written submissions and thereafter the order will be passed appropriately.
4. In view of the stand taken by the State, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the petition pending, accordingly it is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, Durgesh Kumar Asthana, Pradeep Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vijay Kumar Srivastava @ Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Unnao And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
to consider and decide the said application as expeditiously as possible without any further delay.
5. It is made clear that any observations made by the Court may not be treated as an expression of opinion on merits and the Court shall decide the matter in accordance with law. October 16, 2025 ank A227 No. 6196 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench