Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203745 (ALL)

MALTI YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER, FAIZABAD DIVISION, FAIZABAD NOW AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/6135/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6135 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya (Faizabad) to decide Appeal No.1051/2022, computerized case NO.C202204000001051 (Shivnandan Singh and others Vs. Rampyare and others) under Section 331 (3) of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act filed by opposite party No.s 2 to 5, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya (Faizabad) is directed to decide Appeal No.1051/2022, computerized case NO.C202204000001051 (Shivnandan Singh and others Vs. Rampyare and others) under Section 331 (3) of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Sahu, Sonal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Malti Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad Now Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench