Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203728 (ALL)

BUDDHU PRASAD @ PRADHAN LONA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10234/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10234 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 161 of 2025, under Sections 331(4), 310(2), 317(3) 112(2)(B) BNS, P.S. Katka, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that on the same arrest four cases have been lodged against the applicant. The applicant is enlarged on bail in FIR No. 185 of 2025 vide order dated 16.10.2025 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9886 of 2025 and thereafter co accused have been enlarged on bail by trial court itself. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning and the fact that the applicant has same criminal history, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 14.9.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Buddhu Prasad @ Pradhan Lona be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Buddhu Prasad @ Pradhan Lona .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. Since the applicant is enlarged on bail as aforesaid, the surety given in earlier bail application will be sufficient in this case also. October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10234 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench