ROHIT MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9935/2025 · 2025-10-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203722 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203722 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9935 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the informant who has filed his vakalatnama today and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 228 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2M), 65(1) BNS, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in the statements under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS the victim did not support the prosecution story. There is no definite document regarding the exact age of the victim.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rohit Mishra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9935 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench