RADHEYSHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. A.C.S. / PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/9773/2025 · 2025-10-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203718 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203718 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9773 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Niyaj Ahmad, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.65 of 2025, under Sections 80, 85, 352 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant. Subsequently, on account of non- payment of dowry, she was killed by the matrimonial family. The cause of death could not be ascertained. The applicant, who is the husband, had taken the deceased to the hospital.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the cause of death could not be ascertained so far and the fact co-accused has been enlarged on bail and the applicant is in custody since 21.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Radheyshyam be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Saumya Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Radheyshyam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. A.C.S. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9773 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench