1 2025:CGHC:23004 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 56 of 2022 1 - Manharan S/o Nanki Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 2 - Santosh S/o Manharan Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Shyamsundar S/o Rathram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Vijaylaxmi W/o Prakashchandra Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nand Lal S/o Baharata Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 6 - Shiv Kumar S/o Baharata Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 7 - Shivnarayan S/o Baharata Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 8 - Dwarika Prasad S/o Rathram Aged About 45 Years R/o Sakrapali, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Rajesh S/o Manharam Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Pawni, P.H. No. 08, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Baloda Bazar, District - Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Appellants : Mr. S.P. Sahu, Advocate For State-Respondent No.2 : Mrs. Mukta Tripathi, Panel Lawyer. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.06.11 17:27:05 +0530 2 (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 11/06/2025 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that this appeal has become infructuous, as after passing the impugned judgment dated 08.03.2022 by the Third Upper District Judge, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (CG) in Civil Appeal No.53A/2019 whereby the matter has been remitted back to the trial Court, the trial Court has passed the fresh judgment and decree, hence, the appellants do not want to prosecute instant appeal. 3. Having considered aforesaid contention of learned counsel for the appellants, the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar