GHANSHYAM @ RANVIJAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
/492/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203675 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203675 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 492 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.137 of 2024, under Section 302, 120-B of IPC, Police Station Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 02.06.2024, the brother of the informant was attacked by the applicants with regard to a small dispute, in which, all the accused hit the brother of the informant which resulted into death.
4. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the applicant was carrying Danda in his hand, however, it was stated that dispute occurred on account of a dance in a marriage party.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering the fact that mens rea is prima facie missing coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 03.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Ghanshyam alias Ranvijay be released on bail in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Pandey, Sagun Chandra Rastogi, Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ghanshyam @ Ranvijay .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 492 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench