SAVITRI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1139/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203663 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203663 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1139 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. This is the second bail application seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.57 of 2024, under Section 498A, 304B IPC read with Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Raniganj District Pratapgarh.
3. The applicant was granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide order dated 27.05.2024, however, the same was subject to the applicants cooperating during investigation. It is argued that now the charge sheet has been filed.
4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
5. Considering the age of the applicants, and the reasoning recorded in the order dated 27.05.2024 which applies at present also, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicants Savitri Devi and Ram Prakash be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of trial on their furnishing a personal bond each with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anamika Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Savitri Devi And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 13, 2025 nishant ABAIL No. 1139 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench