ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., v. SMT. MULAKATHALLA CHENNAMMA & 5 OTHERS
CMA/691/2013 · 2025-09-03
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20366 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20366 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010285402013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 691/2013 Between:
1. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, BRANCH OFFICE, BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA. ...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT MULAKATHALLA CHENNAMMA, W/O. RAMAIAH, OCC: COOLIE, R/O.
D.NO. 3, WARD NO.3, SAGAR COLONY, RAMANJANEYAPURAM, KADAPA CITY. 2. MULAKATHALLA GANGA DEVI, D/O. RAMAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 3, WARD NO. 3, SAGAR COLONY, RAMANJANEYAPURAM, KADAPA CITY. 3. MULAKATHALLA RAMANJANEYULU, S/O. RAMAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 3, WARD NO. 3, SAGAR COLONY, RAMANJANEYAPURAM, KADAPA CITY. 4. MULAKATHALLA RAMAIAH, S/O. RAMAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 3, WARD NO. 3, SAGAR COLONY, RAMANJANEYAPURAM, KADAPA CITY. 5. MULAKATHALLA GANGAMMA, W/O. RAMAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 3, WARD NO. 3, SAGAR COLONY, RAMANJANEYAPURAM, KADAPA CITY. 6. P SRINIVASULU, S/O. CHINNA NARASIMHULU, OCC: OWNER OF TRACTOR-TRAILER BEARING NO. AP-04-W-6709/6711, R/O. D.NO. 7/261-3, NGO COLONY, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 JS,J C.M.A.No.691/2013
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1495 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 237 day in re-presenting the appeal and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CMAMP 1537 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in WC.No.41/2009 (F) dated 29.09.2012 including the withdrawal of the money deposited before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, at Kadapa IA NO: 3 OF 2013(CMAMP 1980 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted in CMA.MP.No.1537/2013 in CMA.No.691/2013, dated 2/9/2013 and pass IA NO: 6 OF 2013(CMAMP 31603 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY
The Court made the following:
3 JS,J C.M.A.No.691/2013
JUDGMENT:
No representation for the appellant.
On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 24.07.2025, 14.08.2025 and 28.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.09.2025 KAS