Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203649 (ALL)

HEERALAL SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

/1323/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1323 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.200 of 2024, under Section 64 BNS, P.S. Hathigwan, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 18.9.2024 at around 9 PM the applicant who is the father in law of the applicant had committed wrong on her. Learned counsel for the applicant states that subsequent thereto the against the entire matrimonial family a fresh FIR under Section 498A was lodged being FIR 144 of 2025. With regard to the present FIR there is no medical report on record to justify the bald allegations. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering that prima facie it appears to be matrimonial dispute and there being no material against the applicant who is aged above 72 years, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Heeralal Saroj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pratibhan Yadav, Mayankar Singh, Raghvendra Mani Ojha, Santosh Kumar Yadav, Virendra Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi Heeralal Saroj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1323 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench