SHIVAM SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9417/2025 · 2025-10-16
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203645 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203645 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9417 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Sri Sagar Singh holding brief of Sri Srijan Raj Singh learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complaint dated 4.8.2025 was made before the police station Kotwali Dehat, district Sultanpur, in pursuance of which, the compromise as contained in annexure 2 to the writ petition was entered into between the parties. The petitioner demanded a copy of the application from the SHO of the concerned police station as he has no copy but the same has been denied.
2. Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection stating that the petition is not maintainable as the name of the victim has been shown as respondent no. 4 in the present writ petion.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh after impleading the respondents properly.
4. Dismissed accordingly as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. October 16, 2025 kanhaiya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Srijan Raj Singh, Anil Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Shivam Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench