Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203634 (ALL)

ATAVARIS @ AMIR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/9466/2025 · 2025-10-13

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9466 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties no. 1 to 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR No.0306/2025, under Section 69 of the B.N.S. lodged at Police Station Behta Gokul, Distroct Hardoi. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the innocuous aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within three weeks, taking all the pleas and grounds available to him, and if such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. 6 . The writ petition stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 MVS/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shafat Ullah Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Atavaris @ Amir .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench