Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203623 (ALL)

LAUKUSH MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/684/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 684 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.250 of 2024, under Section 85, 80(2), 92 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Baldiray, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that that the sister of the informant was married to the applicant on 11.05.2021. Subsequently, on account of non-payment of dowry, she was killed. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report, was ante mortem hanging. The applicant is the husband of the deceased. 4. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail vide orders on record. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 08.12.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Ambrish Kumar Pandey, Reependra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Laukush Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant Laukush Mishra be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 684 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench