Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203622 (ALL)

LAV KUMAR SOINI @ LAV KUMAR @ LAV KUMAR SAINI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 2 OTHERS

/1142/2025 · 2025-10-13

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1142 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This Criminal Revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act has been filed against the judgment and order dated 14.08.2025, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Balrampur in Criminal Misc. Case No.344 of 2022 (Renu Saini Vs. Lav Kumar), under Section 125 Cr.P.C. whereby Rs.2000/- has been awarded to respondent No.2 and Rs.1000/- per months has been awarded to respondent No.3 as interim maintenance. 3. On being confronted, after taking note of the facts on record according to which the revisionist is a decorator and also the meager amount awarded by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Balrampur (in short "Family Court") towards the interim maintenance i.e. Rs.2000/- per month to the respondent No.2/wife and Rs.1000/- per month to the respondent No. 3/daughter of the revisionist, learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that without interfering in the impugned order the revision be disposed of with some observation so that the application in issue i.e. the application preferred by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in terms of Section 125 Cr.P.C. shall be concluded expeditiously. 4. Taking note of the aforesaid, the present revision, without interfering the impugned order dated 14.08.2025 is disposed of finally with the observation that it is expected from the Family Court concerned to concluded the proceedings in issue most expeditiously as according to various pronouncements in this regard by the Hon'ble Apex Court that the proceedings related to maintenance should be decided most expeditiously (See : Anju Garg and another vs. Deepak Kumar Garg, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1314). October 13, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dileep Kumar Saini, Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Lav Kumar Soini @ Lav Kumar @ Lav Kumar Saini .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench