HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12037 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri R.S. Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1, Shri Ram Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following relief :- "i-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to give arrears of full salary with effect from 12-05-2014 to 19-07-2017, arrears of salary for the period of 25-03- 2013 to 12-05-2014 except subsistence allowance and arrears of salary with effect from 19-07-2017 to 07-05-2018 except to subsistence allowance with 12% interest per annum till the date of actual payment. ii- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to give annual increment for the period of 2013 to 2018 on the basis of the order dated 07-05-2018 which is contained as Annexure No. 5 to the Writ Petition. iii- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to revise the salary of the petitioner with effect from 25-03-2013 on the basis of the order dated 07-05-2018 which is contained as Annexure No. 5 to the Writ Petition." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the services of the petitioner was dismissed and thereafter he preferred an appeal, which was Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Kumar Singh Suresh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) allowed and order of dismissal was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appointing authority and the appointing authority reinstated the petitioner with full back wages. He submitted that the salary to the petitioner w.e.f. certain dues including some substantial allowances have not been paid. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation on 14.05.2025 before the opposite party no. 3/ Chairman, Nagar Panchayat, Banki, District Barabanki. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 3/ Chairman, Nagar Panchayat, Banki, District Barabanki, claiming his all dues and the same is still pending consideration, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. 6. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the opposite party no. 3/ Chairman, Nagar Panchayat, Banki, District Barabanki, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 14.05.2025 within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Mohd. Sharif WRIA No. 12037 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench