Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20360 (JHR)

DAYAMAY GORAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6862/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22840 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6862 of 2025 --------- Dayamay Gorain, aged about 24 years, son of Anil Gorain, Resident of Village Samuk Pokhar, P.O. and P.S.-Karmatar, District-Jamtara. ..… Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party(s) --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Neeharika Mazumdar, Advocate Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Adv For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl, P.P. --------- 2/Dated: 8th August, 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 66 (B)(C)(D) of Information Technology Act and Section 42 (3)(e) of Telecommunication Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent person and has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. She further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. She lastly submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent save and except the present and he is languishing in custody since 14.06.2025. 4. Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 2025:JHHC:22840 2 14.06.2025 and he has got no criminal antecedent; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S.Case No. 44 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and shall not threaten any of the witnesses; failing which the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/