Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2036 (RAJ)

DEEPAK SINGH, S/O LATE SHRI GIRDHARI SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/19563/2025 · 2026-04-28

Anuroop Singhi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19563/2025 Deepak Singh, S/o Late Shri Girdhari Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Tatera, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Govt. Of India, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi - 110 001 2. Indian Bureau Of Mines, 2Nd Floor, Indira Bhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur, Maharashtra-440001 Through Its Controller General. 3. Regional Controller Of Mines, Indian Bureau Of Mines, Makhupura Industrial Area, Ajmer - 305002 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. The Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Khanij Bhawan, Shastri Circle, Udaipur (Rajasthan). 6. Superintending Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, 5Th Floor, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 7. The Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Opposite Hotel Ashok, Road No. 2, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karan Tibrewal For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.S. Sinha for Mr. Bharat Vyas, ASG Mr. Sankalp Vijay with Ms. Tanvisha Pant for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 28/04/2026 1. Mr. Karan Tibrewal, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner has been served with a recent show cause notice dated 19.04.2026 requiring him to (2 of 3) [CW-19563/2025] deposit the due amount within 30 days from the date of issuance thereof. Learned counsel further submits that the ends of justice would be met if the representation already submitted by the petitioner dated 07.11.2025 (Annexure-9) is decided by respondent No.2 at the earliest enabling the petitioner to take remedial actions after any decision is taken on the said representation. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India submits that in case the petitioner appears before the authority, the said representation would be decided within seven days thereafter. 3. Taking note of the above facts and without delving into the merits of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.2 on 05.05.2026 along with all the relevant documents/details to substantiate his stand. 4. In the event of petitioner approaching the respondent No.2 on the aforesaid date, the representation be decided within a period of seven days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation(s) in a particular manner. (3 of 3) [CW-19563/2025] 7. However, in case the grievance of the petitioner still survives, he shall be at liberty to avail the remedies as available in accordance with law. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J TUSHAR KUMAWAT /10