Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203599 (ALL)

RAKESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HME DEPTT. LKO

/9795/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9795 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Vishal Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.468 of 2025, under Section 65(1) of BNS, P.S. Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted bail in other offences vide order dated 03.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8124 of 2025. Subsequently, after investigation Section 65(1) of BNS was also added. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the reasoning recorded while granting bail to the applicant as is evident from the order dated 03.09.2025, the same are applicable in the present case also. Thus, on the same reasoning, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rakesh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number under Section 65(1) of BNS with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rakesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Hme Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. The applicant need not to furnish fresh bail bond and surety and the bail bond and sureties furnished by the applicant in pursuance to the order dated 03.09.2025 shall be valid for this case also. October 13, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9795 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench