Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010228802024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1033/2024 BINOD KUMAR SURANA S/O LATE PANNALAL SURANA, HOUSE NO. 38A, SHAKTI KUNJ, 2ND FLOOR, OPP. EARLY BIRD MONTESSORI SCHOOL, SHANTIPUR, GUWAHATI-9, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:NARENDRA SURANA S/O LATE PRITHWIRAJ SURANA R/O FLAT NO. MF-G SATYAM APARTMENT 7A/2 RAJPUR ROAD CIVIL LINES DELHI-11005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H BETALA, MR H BETALA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Pet./837/2024 BINOD KUMAR SURANA S/O LATE PANNALAL SURANA HOUSE NO. 38A
Page No.# 2/3 SHAKTI KUNJ 2ND FLOOR OPP. EARLY BIRD MONTESSORI SCHOOL SHANTIPUR GUWAHATI-9 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM 2:NARENDRA SURANA S/O LATE PRITHWIRAJ SURANA R/O FLAT NO. MF-G SATYAM APARTMENT 7A/2 RAJPUR ROAD CIVIL LINES DELHI-110054 ------------ Advocate for : MR. P K GARODIA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 21.05.2025
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. H. Betala for the applicant Binod Kumar Surana who has filed this application for modification/alteration/rectification of the order dated 23.07.2024 passed by this Court in connection with Crl.Pet No. 837/2024. 2. Heard learned counsel Mr. P. Sharma for the respondent No. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. P. Borthakur for the respondent No. 1. Page No.# 3/3
3. The appellant has filed this application stating that in the order dated 23.07.2024, passed by this Court in connection with Crl.Pet. No. 837/2024, a typographical error has crept up in Para-5 and para-11 of the order. It is submitted that instead of typing ‘complaint’, the word ‘contempt’ was typed in the 4th line of paragraph No. 5 and in the 1st line of paragraph No. 11. 4. After considering the submissions at the Bar, this application is allowed for correction of the word. The word ‘complaint’ is to be typed in the 4th line of paragraph No. 5 and in the 1st line of paragraph No. 11 of the order dated 23.07.2024 in connection with Crl.Pet. No. 837/2024. The word ‘contempt’ in the respective paragraphs to be deleted. 5. This order will also form a part of the order dated 23.07.2024 in connection with Crl.Pet. No. 837/2024.
6. In terms of the above observation, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant