Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203589 (ALL)

KALINDRI @ SHAILENDRI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/9824/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9824 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.333 of 2025, under Sections 105 and 352 BNS, P.S. Laharpur, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that on 13.6.2025 the father of the informant aged about 75 years was beaten by all the accused including the applicant with lathi, danda which subsequently resulted in his death. The post mortem report indicates the presence of as many as 5 injuries including head injuries which is also the cause of death. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that earlier FIR was lodged at the instance of the applicant against the opposite parties being FIR No. 332 of 2025. Apart from the said it is argued that there is no specific allegation against the applicant who is a lady of having caused the injury which caused the death. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant, a lady, who is in jail since 24.7.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Kalindri @ Shailendri be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kalindri @ Shailendri .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9824 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench