HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9871 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 05.09.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 2 be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2/Regional Transport Officer, Ayodhya, is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. Till that period, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pathak, Vijay Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mr.Shiv Sharan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) 7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 9871 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench