Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203577 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. 5 OTHERS

/9817/2025 · 2025-10-13

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9817 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 16.09.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.4/ Deputy Collector, Colonelganj, Tehsil Colonelganj, District Gonda is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other relevant parties. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Pratap Singh, Maneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anindya Shastri (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ashok Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Panchayati Raj Lko. 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench