RAHUL YADAV ALIAS RAHUL KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6894/2025 · 2025-08-08
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20356 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20356 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:23038 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6894 of 2025
--------- Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav, age about 28 years, Son of Sri Bhagwan Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-Bulka, P.O.-Bulka, P.S.- Ramna, District-Garhwa
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025
1.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with Ramna P.S. Case No.40/2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the informant and the petitioner are gotiyas and there exists a land dispute between them and thus criminal cases are pending against them before learned trial court. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is working as a labour and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 27.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the
2025:JHHC:23038 2 allegation made against this petitioner which is general and omnibus allegation coupled with the fact that there exists a land dispute between them; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Ramna P.S. Case No.40/2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-