HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8546 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Counter affidavit as well as Vakalatnama filed by Mrs. Prabhjot Kaur, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the charge sheet no. 0001/2023, dated 24-06-2023, under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act arising out of case crime no.0024/2023, under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Krishna Nagar, District- Lucknow and entire proceedings in pursuance thereof." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 25.08.2025, a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 30.08.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Firdaus Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Devid Saini @ Ashu Saini (Husband) And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The charge sheet no. 0001/2023, dated 24.06.2023, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act arising out of case crime no.0024/2023, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Krishna Nagar, District- Lucknow and entire proceedings in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. October 13, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8546 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench