CWP-10154-2001 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CWP-10154-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 Parvesh Rani …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- None for the petitioner Dr. Neha Awasthi, Additional Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 11.06.2001, Annexure P-7, whereby the petitioner has been refused appointment to the post of Art and Craft Teacher in response to advertisement 3/99, dated 14.11.1999. 2. Learned State counsel contended that the petitioner did not have the essential qualification required for the post as her Diploma in Art and Craft from Paper Craft & Papier Mache Centre, New Delhi, had not been recognised by the Government. The respondents have taken a specific stand to that effect in the written statement, which is as under: 1. That the present writ petition has been filled by the petitioner against the order passed by the respondent No.2 Annexure P-7. The petitioner has acquired two years diploma in Paper Craft & Papier Mache Centre Bunkar Bhawan, Weavers, PAYAL 2025.08.26 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-10154-2001 (O&M) -2- Colony Bharat Nagar Delhi and on the basis of the said qualification she applied for the post of Arts & Crafts Teacher in Haryana Education Department. However she was selected for the said post in advertently because the said diploma/qualification is not recognised neither by the Haryana State nor by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (copy attached) Annexure R-I. Government of India Ministry of Labour Directorate General of Employment and Training Delhi has also informed this office that the two years course in Paper Craft and Papier Mache Centre Bunkar Bhawan, Weavers, Colony Bharat Nagar Delhi is not recognized under National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT). Copy attached at Annexure R-II. Hence the claim of the petitioner vague, baseless and untenable. 3. The fact that the petitioner’s Diploma is not recognised either by the Government or the National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT), has not been disputed by her by filing any counter affidavit. 4. In view thereof, the petitioner has no right of consideration against the post in question as she lacks the essential qualification. 5. Dismissed. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 21.08.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.08.26 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment