ANURAG THUKRAL ALIAS ANNU THUKRAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/203/2021 · 2025-01-07
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2035 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2035 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:230 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 203 of 2021 UHon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. None appears for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for State of Uttarakhand.
2. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged Notice dated 25.08.2018, issued by District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar under Section 3 of U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that externment
order passed under Section 3(3)(a) of the Act, is valid only for a period of six months. He submits that Writ Petition was filed in 2021 and externment order, if any, passed against petitioner, would have expired long back.
4. This Court finds substance in the said submission.
5. Since there is no interim order passed in the writ petition protecting the petitioner from any action under U.P. Control of Goondas Act, therefore, the externment
order passed against petitioner by the Competent Authority must have expired by now.
6. Thus, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 07.01.2025 Mahinder/
MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.01.08 14:10:58 +05'30'