IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Review Petition No.83 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 _______________________________________________________ Kamaljeet alias Kamal Singh …….Petitioner Versus The Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank & others … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent-Bank. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Though, having carefully perused the grounds taken by the review petitioner in review petition vis-à-vis judgment sought to be reviewed, this Court has no hesitation to conclude that there is no error apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed and as such, no interference is called for, however, having taken note of the reply filed by the respondents, perusal whereof reveals that respondent-Bank had recommended the case of the petitioner for regularization in terms of policy, subject to fulfillment of certain 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 conditions, this Court deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with the observation that recommendation, if any, made by the respondent-bank to the Registrar Cooperative Societies for considering the case of the petitioner for regularization or framing contractual policy shall be considered afresh without being influenced by the judgment dated 25.06.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 3874 of 2022, titled Kamal Kumar versus The H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank Limited and others alongwith connected matters. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge January 05, 2026 (shankar)