1 2025:CGHC:2310 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1029 of 2018 1 - Lakhan Lal Gupta S/o Babu Lal Gupta Aged About 60 Years R/o- Near Bus Stand Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara (Town), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Uma Devi Gupta W/o Lakhan Lal Gupta Aged About 61 Years R/o- Near Bus Stand Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara (Town), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Manish Kumar Gupta S/o Lakhan Lal Gupta Aged About 45 Years R/o- Near Bus Stand Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara (Town), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Manoj Kumar Gupta S/o Lakhan Lal Gupta Aged About 41 Years R/o- Near Bus Stand Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara (Town), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus Jagjeet Singh Saluja S/o Pratap Singh Saluja Aged About 24 Years R/o- Balbhadra Ward Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara (Town), District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uttam Chand, Advocate on behalf of Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.16 10:58:33 +0530 2 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 14.01.2025 1. Mr. Uttam Chand, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. T.K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer : “It is, therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 31-01-2018 (Annexure P-1) and be pleased to pass an order to maintain the order dated 04-02-2013 (Annexure P-2), in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he wants to participate in the proceedings, as the matter has been remanded by the competent Court. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 4. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Rahul Dewangan