RAM KESH AND 33 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
A227/12409/2025 · 2025-10-12
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203469 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203469 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12409 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"Issue a order or direction directing the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi to decide the Temporary injunction application paper no-6-C dated 28-2-2025 filed in Original Suit no-275 of 2025 Raj Kesh & others versus State of U. P. & other pending in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi within a specified period."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shambhavi Nandan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vineet Sankalp Ram Kesh And 33 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
6. This order has been passed in presence of Shri Satyam Rawat, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vineet Sankalp, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 & 5. October 13, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12409 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad