HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33289 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri S.K. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for State at length. 2. At this stage, this writ petition is disposed of reserving a liberty to petitioner to submit his explanation towards recovery amount since it appears that petitioner was not able to submit his detailed reply and thereafter concerned respondents will revisit the impugned order, if explanation is satisfactory. 3. It is further observed that in order to show his bonafide, the petitioner will deposit Rs. 25,000/- along with his explanation before concerned respondents subject to outcome of consideration of explanation. October 13, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh, Surendra Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ranveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad