Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203414 (ALL)

Pawan Kumar (Home Guard, Reg no.669 Company Behandar, Hardoi) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. OF HOME DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14801/2025 · 2025-12-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14801 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i). Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing opposite party no.3 to decide the show-cause notice by considering the petitioner's reply in accordance with the law and the Government Order dated 18.08.2023, as contained in Annexure no.1 of this petition. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing opposite party no.3 to rejoin/reinstate the petitioner in the post of Home Guard." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently certain relevant pleading could not be made due to which he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh. 4. In view of such submissions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting aforesaid liberty. December 18, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Pratap, Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Pawan Kumar (Home Guard, Reg No.669 Company Behandar, Hardoi) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Of Home Deptt., Lucknow And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench