Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20341 (GAU)

MURSIDA BEGUM @ MURSIDA KHATUN v. GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI, IAS AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/588/2024 · 2025-02-16

Manish Choudhury

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010229712024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/588/2024 MURSIDA BEGUM @ MURSIDA KHATUN W/O EKRAMUL HOQUE, VILL- JHAGRARPAR PART-I, P.O.-JHAGRARPAR, P.S.-DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783324 VERSUS GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI, IAS AND ANR COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM 2:DIBAKAR NATH IAS THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78330 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN, MR A.K. MOLLAH,MR. R I MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R BORPUJARI (R1), MR. S DUTTA (R1),MS G HAZARIKA (R1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 17.02.2025 Page No.# 2/2 Mr. A.K. Mollah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 have submitted that the direction made in the Order dated 05.08.2022 passed in the writ petition, W.P.[C.] no. 4997/2022, in respect of which the contempt petition was preferred, has since been complied with. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the parties that the direction made in the Order dated 05.08.2022 [supra] has since been complied with, the contempt petition is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant