HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12121 of 2022 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is very fairly argued by Sri Krishna Kant Tiwari, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that due to subsequent development, petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition, hence a prayer has been made to dismiss the present writ petition as having become infructuous. 2. This prayer has not been opposed by the counsel for the respondents. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 13, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Tiwari, Krishna Kant Tiwari, Shikhar Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sanjay Kumar Om, Sudeep Harkauli (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Padmakar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad