[2025:RJ-JP:5083-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.501/2024 IN D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18753/2023 1. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shri Panchu Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Barkada Ki Dhani, Village Kharad, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 2. Dharamraj Meena S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Kharad, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Sudhansh Pant, Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Prakash Rajpurohit, District Collector Jaipur, Collectorate Campus, Banipark, Jaipur. 3. Lalit Meena, Sub Divisional Office Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. 4. Kamal Chand Sharma, Tehsildar Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 5. Babu Lal Meena S/o Ramnath Meena, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Kharad Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 6. Sitaram Meena S/o Ramnath Meena, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Kharad Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 7. Mukesh Meena S/o Ramnath Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Kharad Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 8. Omprakash Meena S/o Ramnath Meena, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village Kharad Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 9. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv., for Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma, Adv., with [2025:RJ-JP:5083-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-501/2024] Ms. Kritika Sahu, Adv., for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv., with Ms. Sampati Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 05/02/2025 Though the case is listed awaiting service of notice on respondents on non-filing of PF to the unserved respondent Nos.7 & 8, we find that this contempt petition was filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 21.11.2023 by which this Court directed the Tehsildar to expeditiously conclude the proceedings on the basis of material collected before it where allegations of encroachment have been made. It was further directed that the Tehsildar shall conclude the proceedings within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, after giving due opportunity of hearing to private respondents in the writ petition namely, Babu Lal Meena, Sitaram Meena, Mukesh Meena & Omprakash Meena. From the reply filed by the State, it reveals that belatedly on 07.02.2024 the Tehsildar has passed an order of dispossession of as many as 12 persons which includes the name of private respondents as well. Though, learned counsel appearing for private respondents would submit that the order of the Tehsildar is illegal, we are not inclined to go into the correctness, legality and validity of the order passed by the Tehsildar in these proceedings. Once the order passed by this Court has been complied with, we are not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. [2025:RJ-JP:5083-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-501/2024] Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. It would however be open for those who are aggrieved by the order of the Tehsildar to take appropriate proceedings, if not already taken. Rule is discharged. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ F.R. Bohra/Danish/44