Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20340 (KAR)

MR. REDDY VEERANNA v. DR. MAHESH M

CCC/332/2024 · 2025-01-20

M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2103-DB CCC No. 332 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. REDDY VEERANNA SON OF R. SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 109 10TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVA NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 080 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. ABRAHAM JOSEPH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. MAHESH M CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD AT NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2103-DB CCC No. 332 of 2024 EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. H L PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACCUSED ARE GUILTY OF THE CONTEMPT OF ORDER DATED 26.07.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.A.NO.686/2023 (GM-KIADB) AND W.A.NO.689/2023 (GM-KIADB) ( AT ANNEXURE-A), ETC THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2103-DB CCC No. 332 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The judgment and order brought under this contempt petition is already subject matter of Writ Appeal Nos.1772 of 2024 and 1797 of 2024. The said appeals were posted on board today at serial Nos.10 and 10.1 which have stood adjourned to 05.02.2025 as per the order passed by this Court today. 2. In that view of the order alleged to be violated is under challenge in the writ appeals, no purpose will be served in keeping this contempt petition pending. However, it is directed that the parties shall abide by the outcome of the appeals. 3. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24