HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12490 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 562 of 2025 under Sections 303(2), 317(2) BNS, P.S.-Kotwali Ayodhya, District-Ayodhya/Faizabad. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that twenty e-rickshaw batteries alleged to have recovered from the possession of the applicant and co-accused persons. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. Applicant has explained his criminal history of three cases in para 15 of the bail application. The offence is triable by a Magistrate. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 22.09.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record. On due consideration of the facts that applicant has been languishing in jail since 22.09.2025, the alleged offence is triable my Magistrate and applicant has explained the criminal history, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Let the applicant-Sandeep Dixit, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 12, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12490 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench