RAM KRIPAL v. DISTRICT MAGISTRTE, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
A227/7320/2025 · 2025-12-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203350 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203350 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7320 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the State.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has sought a direction to Up- Ziladhikari, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur to ensure compliance of his own order dated 10.5.2022 passed in case No.RST/3570/2017, computerized case No.T 2017046850073570 "Ram Kripal Vs. Gaon Sabha and others" under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code.
4. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy by moving appropriate application under Section 22 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for fixing stones. 5.At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and seeks liberty to approach competent authority.
6. The petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh application under Section 22 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for fixing stones. 7.In case, such an application is moved the competent authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 18, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Kripal .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrte, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench