SHANKAR PRASAD CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/539/2023 · 2025-02-07
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20334 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20334 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.539 of 2023
-----
1. Shankar Prasad Choudhary
2. Shyam Sundar Das
3. Pramod Kumar Tiwary
4. Vivekanand Ram
5. Nageshwar Layak
6. Shiv Kumar Jha
7. Babudhan Hansda
8. Sona Lal Hansda
9. Mrityunjay Jha
….. …. Petitioner(s) Vrs.
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Sri Manoj Kumar
…. …. Opp. Party(s)
------
CORAM :SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s):-
For the Respondent(s):-Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate
09/07.02.2025
Learned counsel for the respondent is present but no one appears on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Vide order dated 17.01.2023 passed in W.P.(S). No. 5037 of 2021 (Annexure 1), the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioners and pass a reasoned order.
3. The counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank submits that a reasoned order has already been passed and the same is being brought on record as Annexure No. Ato the counter affidavit.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact, I find that no contempt is made out.
5. This contempt application is dropped.
6. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the reasoned order, it will be open for them to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Rashmi/-