Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20334 (CHH)

VISHNUDAS BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3145/2025 · 2025-06-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3145 of 2025 Vishnudas Banjare S/o Ramudas Banjare Aged About 64 Years Occupation - Retired Branch Manager, District Cooperative Bank, R/o Village - Parsatti, Post - Bamhani, Tahsil - Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Financial And Commercial Tax Registration/ C.G. Government, Raipur 2 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, G.E. Road, Head Office, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur, Through Its Chief Executive Office, Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Head Office, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Joint Registrar Cooperative Institution, Chhattisgarh Government, Opposite Lalganga Shopping Mall, Near Farishta Complex, G.E. Road, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Prakash Kumar Goswami, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri S Choubey, PL For Respondents-2 and 3 : Shri Sandeep Dubey, and Shri Manas Vajpai, Advocates ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 19.06.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner wants to redress his grievance before the Registrar, Cooperative Tribunal, Raipur, as the matter pertains to the Cooperative dispute. Hence he does not want to press this petition and prays for withdrawal of the same, with liberty to raise his grievance before the Registrar, Cooperative Tribunal, Raipur in appropriate proceeding. Wps 3145 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents not opposed the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma