Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203327 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/1251/2025 · 2025-12-12

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1251 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Amrendra Baksh Das, Advocate holding brief of Shir Manjeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State and Shri Mohd. Arif Khan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Gao Sabha. 2. By means of the present petition filed in public interest, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachment made on land bearing Gata No.300/0.08130 hectares, situated at Village- Pure Banshi, Tehsil- Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh. 3. On the basis of written instruction, learned counsel for the Gao Sabha has informed that an application for setting aside the order dated 30.10.2023 is pending. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed off with the direction to the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh to decide the application for setting aside the order dated 30.10.2023/application under Section 67 of UP Revenue Code, expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. December 12, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Krishna Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench