ROHIT RAJARAM ALIAS RAJARAM KUMAR SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4786/2024 · 2025-03-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20330 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20330 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4786 of 2024
------
1. Rohit Rajaram @ Rajaram Kumar Sah, aged about 26 years, S/o Shambhu Sah.
2. Mithun Sah, aged about 26 years, S/o Prakash Sah,
3. Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Sah, aged about 19 years, S/o Bhujal Sah.
4. Bhudev Sah, aged about 24 years, S/o Bhujal Sah All are resident of village –Latouna, P.O. –Latouna, P.S. – Pathargama, Dist. –Godda.
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Purnendu Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.06 Dated- 06.03.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 341/323/325/326/307/504/506/354B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder Sitaram Kumar and Sunil Kumar Bharti causing injuries to them and disrobed the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.1 has filed Complaint Case No. 63 of 2024. It is next submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant,
victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda, in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-