IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.36804 of 2025 Nabanita Jagaty …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Brundaban Rout, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Party(s) Mr. Debraj Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 17.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, inter alia, making the following relief:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application and issue writ/writs in the nature of Mandamus/ Certiorari or any appropriate writs pleased to quash the proceeding pending against the present petitioner in Mutation Appeal No.96/2025 in the court of the learned Sub Collector, Bhubaneswar when the registered sale deed in favour of the present petitioner is still valid and the purchase land is duly recorded in her favour vide Khatian No.226/690 under Annexure-3. And if the opp.parties failed to show cause or showing insufficient cause, the said Rule be made absolute. And pass such further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper. And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound ever pray.” 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition to resort to the other civil remedy available to him under law. 4. Since the disputed question of facts is involved in the present case, the writ is not an appropriate remedy. Hence, liberty is granted to the petitioner to resort to the right remedy available to him under law. 5. With the aforementioned liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (S.S. Mishra) Judge Swarna