HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1376 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.913 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 191(3), 127(2), 109, 117(2) BNS, P.S. Sushant Golf City, district Lucknow. 3.Learned counsel for applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated. The applicants side has also been injured. The first information report of the applicants was not registered. Thereafter, 112 number was dialled and only then, first information report was registered. 4.Learned A.G.A. while opposing the bail application has submitted that it is not a case of false implication. Both the sides have suffered injuries. The incident is admitted. 5.I have considered the submission and perused the record. It appears that three persons are injured in this case. Father of the complainant Asha Ram suffered fracture involving right parietal and temporal bones. The injures are grievous in nature. It cannot be said to be a Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Rani, Shravan Kumar and Gopi alias govind Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) case of false implication. The trial court while rejecting the application for anticipatory bail has made following observations : " 7. ्ऺस्तुत ्ऺकरण में आवेदकगण/अिभयु्वगण पर यह आरोप है िक उनके ्षारा वादी मुकदमा व उसके माता-िपता को जान से मारने की नीयत से ताबड़तोड ्ऺहार िकया गया, िजससे वादी व उसके िपता का िसर फट गया तथा बादी की माता को पैर में गम्भीर चोट आयी। कै स डायरी के पचचार्-4 के अनुसार, चोटिहल आशाराम िदनांक 29.10.2025 को अस्पताल में भती हुआ और िदनांक 02.11.2025 को िडस्चाजर् हुआ तथा चोटिहल को िसर में ' Fracture involving right parietal and temporal bones' आना अंिकत है। यादी मुकदमा ्षारा आवेदकगण/अिभयु्वगण के िवरु्ध नामजद ्ऺथम सूचना िरपोटर् दजर् करायी गयी है। मामला िववेचनाधीन है। ्ऺकरण गम्भीर ्ऺकृ ित का है। अतः मामले के तथ्यों एवं पिरिस्थितयार् तथा अपराध की गंभीरता के दृि्िगल इस स्तर पर आवेदकगण/अिभयु्वगण को अि्षम जमानत ्ऺदान िकये जाने का कोई आधार नहीं पाया जाता है। लदैव, ्ऺस्तुत अि्षम जमानत ्ऺाथर्ना प्ऴ िनरस्त िकये जाने योग्य है। आदेश आवेदकगण/अिभयु्वगण राज रानी, ्शवण कु मार व गोपी उफर् गोिवन्द की ओर से ्ऺस्तुत अि्षम जमानत आवेदन िनरस्त िकया जाता है।" 6.In view of the submission advanced, observations of the trial court, extracted above, injuries sustained by the injured, the fact that cross first information reports have been registered, it cannot be said that it is a case of false implication. Prima facie, complicity of the applicant is evident. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. 7.The application is dismissed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. December 12, 2025/kkb/ ABAIL No. 1376 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench