VINAY YADAV @ VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME MINISTRY LKO
/5511/2025 · 2025-12-12
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5511 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025, under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 126(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Shivratanganj, District Amethi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that ten unknown persons and 2 to 3 known persons had attacked the brother of the informant which resulted in substantial injuries. Injury report is on record. He further submits that co-accused persons Shesh Shukla @ Suyash Shukla, Girija Shankar Shukla, Adarsh Shukla and Devesh Shukla have been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 01.12.2025, 21.11.2025, 24.11.2025 and 24.11.2025. The applicant seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused persons. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the general allegations levelled against the all the persons, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 03.05.2025, and has criminal history of one case, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Sharma, Rahul Yadav, Sunny Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kaushal Tiwari Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Ministry Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
December 12, 2025 R.C.
BAIL No. 5511 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench