Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9884 WP No. 4214 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 4214 OF 2016 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:
1 SMT. ERAMMA W/O. LATE. MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
1(A). M. MUNIRAJU, S/O LATE M. MUNIVENKATAPPA AND LATE. ERAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
1(B). M. RAVINDRA, S/O LATE M. MUNIVENKATAPPA AND LATE. ERAMMA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
1(C). M. BHASKAR, S/O LATE M. MUNIVENKATAPPA AND LATE. ERAMMA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
1(D). SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O LATE M. MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.17, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK EAST
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9884 WP No. 4214 of 2016
BYRASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 011. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ARJUN J.S, ADVOCATE FOR P1 (A AND B) (ABSENT);
P1(D) IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
NOTICE ISSUED TO P1(C) IS RETURNED)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
3.
THE SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHRAYA LAGALI, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.01.2011 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE WP AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE AND ETC.,
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9884 WP No. 4214 of 2016
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The Court notice issued to the petitioner No.1(c) has returned with postal shara that the 'item was returned as unclaimed' on 10.09.2024.
2. No useful purpose would be served, by once again issuing Court notice to the petitioner No.1(c).
3. There is no representation for the other petitioners also. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 CT: BHK