MANOJ KUMAR @ MANOJ VERMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
/7171/2025 · 2025-12-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7171 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogehs Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the interim relief application as well as the instant appeal, appeal No. 1541/2025 U/S 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (against the order passed by the S.D.M. Amethi on dated 05.06.2025 in Case No. T202404710509260 U/S U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the interim relief application filed along with aforesaid appeal.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya to consider and decide interim relief application filed along with appeal No. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar, Virendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Verma And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
1541/2025 U/S 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (against the order passed by the S.D.M. Amethi on dated 05.06.2025 in Case No. T202404710509260 U/S U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. December 12, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7171 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench