AYAAN QURESHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR UNNAO AND 2 OTHERS
/12097/2025 · 2025-12-12
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12097 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State, Respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Hemant Kumar Mishra, who appears on behalf of the Respondent no.3, Zila Panchayat, Unnao. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
"i) Issue the order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the alleged impugned order of seizure of after summoning the same from the opposite party no2. ii) Issue the, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Unnao, (Opposite party no.1) to consider and decide the Representation dated 18.11.2025 made by the petitioner in accordance with law as contained in Annexure No.6 to the writ petition."
3. The counsel for the State-respondents has placed before this Court instruction sent by the S.D.M. Sadar, Unnao, dated 11.12.2025 wherein it has been stated that after receiving several complaints regarding Obnoxious Smell / Stench of dead animals coming from the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, Brijesh Kumar Srivastava, Pawan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hemant Kumar Mishra Ayaan Qureshi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate/Collector Unnao And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
area, the Industrial Area Site no.1 of Village Chandpur was tried to be inspected but the plot in question was bounded by a boundary wall and on the main gate there was a lock. The Electricity meter installed at the gate indicated the name of Shri Ayaan Qureshi. Since, there was no one inside and it was not possible to enter the premises to conduct a proper Investigation / Inspection and the stench of dead animals was over powering, therefore, the premises were sealed. 4. The instructions are kept on record. 5. The petitioner has only prayed for a Mandamus to be issued to the District Magistrate to consider and decide the Representation dated
18.11.2025. 6.
We, therefore, dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the District Magistrate, Unnao, to look into the grievance of the petitioner and call for a report from the S.D.M. Sadar, District Unnao, and then take an appropriate decision in the matter by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. December 12, 2025 N.PAL WRIC No. 12097 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench