MOHAMMAD VAISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/7137/2025 · 2025-12-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7137 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.381 of 2025, under Sections 333, 75(2), 76, 64(1) of BNS, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 22.05.2025, the informant was out of home and the daughter and the daughter-in-law of the informant were at home when the applicant came and entered into the house and locked the daughter-in-law in one room and thereafter misbehaved with the daughter of the informant in a separate room and when she was shouted, the applicant ran away when the villagers came. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim stated that on the same day, physical relations were also formed. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim reiterated the same version and stated that she wanted to marry with the applicant. It was also alleged that the applicant is the relative of the victim. The medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. The tentative age of the victim is around 20 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav, Poonam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shiv Shankar Verma Mohammad Vaish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
and the medical not corroborating the allegations and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 28.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Mohammad Vaish be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 12, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7137 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench