Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20326 (HP)

SYNERGISTIC YOUTH SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/6029/2020 · 2025-03-10

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:5523 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6029 of 2020 Date of Decision: 10.03.2025 ____________________________________________________ Synergistic Youth Social and Cultural Organisation (SYSCO) ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 & 4 to 6/State. Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel ,for respondent No.7. Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.9. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:5523 ) Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.10, 11 & 13. Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.14 & 15. ____________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Looking the order dated 18.11.2021 passed by the National Green Tribunal as upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 17.12.2021 and further taking into consideration the fact that the Petrol Pump in question is fully operational, we see no reason to interfere in the instant petition. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) March 10, 2025 Judge (VH)