SMT. SHAIL KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/11999/2025 · 2025-12-10
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11999 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents and Sri Ajay Kumar Raj Singh, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.5.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 24-02-2024 passed by Tahsildar / Assistant Collector Kadipur Sultanpur, by which Tahsildar / Assistant Collector Kadipur Sultanpur want to evict the petitioner from his constructed house situated at bearing Gata No. 479/0.013 hectare at village Panchayat Dosipur Pargana Aldemau Tahsil Kadipur Sultanpur and wants to recover compensation of Rs. 1650 from the petitioner contained as Annexure No.4 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature Mandamus thereby directing and commanding to the respondent no. 2, i.e. District Magistrate District Sultanpur to inquire the matter through three member committee and employees and officers of the revenue of Kadiour and Nagar Panchayat Dostpur involved may be punished."
3. There is a request for adjournment on behalf of the counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Aman Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar Singh Raj Smt. Shail Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner.
4. Sri Ajay Kumar Raj Singh, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.5 has objected to such adjournment being granted. He says that the writ petition itself is not maintainable. It has been submitted that a perusal of order dated 24.02.2024 would show that it has been passed by the Tehsildar- Kadipur Sultanpur in proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
5. Against such order the petitioner has remedy of filing an appeal, which has not been filed till date.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority. December 10, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 11999 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench